Luverne at Redwood Falls
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Luverne at Redwood Falls
Who wins?
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am
- Location: Not Luverne
Re: Luverne at Redwood Falls
If Luverne can score early they may score often. I anticipate Redwood has a much better offensive showing against Luverne then they did in the first meeting.elliott70 wrote:Who wins?
My prediction-
Luverne: 7
Redwood Valley: 5
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am
- Location: Not Luverne
It's the same team as much as Princeton is the same team as the one that got pounded 10-0 by Rogers. Teams have bad games, Princeton certainly isn't a 10 goal under dog to Rogers and Luverne isn't a 5 goal favorite over Redwood in my opinion. (This year)MrBoDangles wrote:Are we talking the same Redwood that got pounded by Ely and ripped a new one by North Shore? Even Mora only lost by one to this team!!
Luverne should win by a minimum of five... Unless they've fallen that drastically.
For these teams in the south to go north and play against teams up there is a different transition. Much more physical game to acclimate to.
Redwood will score goals at home. Could absolutely win if they get decent goal tending.
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Rogers and North Shore/Ely are worlds apart in talent.GoldyGopher wrote:It's the same team as much as Princeton is the same team as the one that got pounded 10-0 by Rogers. Teams have bad games, Princeton certainly isn't a 10 goal under dog to Rogers and Luverne isn't a 5 goal favorite over Redwood in my opinion. (This year)MrBoDangles wrote:Are we talking the same Redwood that got pounded by Ely and ripped a new one by North Shore? Even Mora only lost by one to this team!!
Luverne should win by a minimum of five... Unless they've fallen that drastically.
For these teams in the south to go north and play against teams up there is a different transition. Much more physical game to acclimate to.
Redwood will score goals at home. Could absolutely win if they get decent goal tending.
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am
- Location: Not Luverne
Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.MrBoDangles wrote:Rogers and North Shore/Ely are worlds apart in talent.GoldyGopher wrote:It's the same team as much as Princeton is the same team as the one that got pounded 10-0 by Rogers. Teams have bad games, Princeton certainly isn't a 10 goal under dog to Rogers and Luverne isn't a 5 goal favorite over Redwood in my opinion. (This year)MrBoDangles wrote:Are we talking the same Redwood that got pounded by Ely and ripped a new one by North Shore? Even Mora only lost by one to this team!!
Luverne should win by a minimum of five... Unless they've fallen that drastically.
For these teams in the south to go north and play against teams up there is a different transition. Much more physical game to acclimate to.
Redwood will score goals at home. Could absolutely win if they get decent goal tending.
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!GoldyGopher wrote:Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.MrBoDangles wrote:Rogers and North Shore/Ely are worlds apart in talent.GoldyGopher wrote: It's the same team as much as Princeton is the same team as the one that got pounded 10-0 by Rogers. Teams have bad games, Princeton certainly isn't a 10 goal under dog to Rogers and Luverne isn't a 5 goal favorite over Redwood in my opinion. (This year)
For these teams in the south to go north and play against teams up there is a different transition. Much more physical game to acclimate to.
Redwood will score goals at home. Could absolutely win if they get decent goal tending.
Amen!MrBoDangles wrote:We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!GoldyGopher wrote:Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.MrBoDangles wrote: Rogers and North Shore/Ely are worlds apart in talent.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 5:28 pm
Luverne will come out on top #Foundation in placeWhiner33 wrote:Amen!MrBoDangles wrote:We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!GoldyGopher wrote: Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am
- Location: Not Luverne
You want an opinion on Luverne? Reference the game on 1/5/16 in your own arena.Whiner33 wrote:Amen!MrBoDangles wrote:We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!GoldyGopher wrote: Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am
- Location: Not Luverne
Ha, yeah. That year change is hard to get used to. I'm definitely not referring to the 14-0 victory over Fairmont that happened 1/5/16.bardown27 wrote:I assume you mean 1/5/17?GoldyGopher wrote:You want an opinion on Luverne? Reference the game on 1/5/16 in your own arena.Whiner33 wrote: Amen!
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:42 pm
Re: Luverne at Redwood Falls
My prediction:elliott70 wrote:Who wins?
Luverne 6
RV 5
In OT.
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am
- Location: Not Luverne
Re: Luverne at Redwood Falls
6-0 Luverne right nowTrojanHockeyFan wrote:My prediction:elliott70 wrote:Who wins?
Luverne 6
RV 5
In OT.
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration
Re: Luverne at Redwood Falls
Time for the extra point in the third? Joe has to be getting anxious to pull the goalie? The poor kid......
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 5:28 pm
Re: Luverne at Redwood Falls
Good to see things coming together... #foundation-in-placeWhiner33 wrote:Time for the extra point in the third? Joe has to be getting anxious to pull the goalie? The poor kid......
Actually - Chisago Lakes beat Princeton and Monticello, so they should be the 1 seed at this point.elliott70 wrote:Like I said...
You nailed, Luverne nailed it...
They should be the #1 seed, if they don't choke they should be back at the X.
Now what about Princeton and Monticello. (Should we throw Pine City and North Branch in there, too?)
Over looked them completely...BP wrote:Actually - Chisago Lakes beat Princeton and Monticello, so they should be the 1 seed at this point.elliott70 wrote:Like I said...
You nailed, Luverne nailed it...
They should be the #1 seed, if they don't choke they should be back at the X.
Now what about Princeton and Monticello. (Should we throw Pine City and North Branch in there, too?)
No matter the seeding the section tourney should be good.
After that, not so good, but a chance to play at the X is a good start for any program.
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am
- Location: Not Luverne
Yeah, I knew if Luverne got on them early it was going to be troublesome. Luverne and Monticello was more low scoring then I thought it would be but Princeton didn't have hardly any shots on goal. Zwack is pretty good.elliott70 wrote:Over looked them completely...BP wrote:Actually - Chisago Lakes beat Princeton and Monticello, so they should be the 1 seed at this point.elliott70 wrote:Like I said...
You nailed, Luverne nailed it...
They should be the #1 seed, if they don't choke they should be back at the X.
Now what about Princeton and Monticello. (Should we throw Pine City and North Branch in there, too?)
No matter the seeding the section tourney should be good.
After that, not so good, but a chance to play at the X is a good start for any program.
I like Monticello to get to the X this year in 5A. I just don't see Chisago being the team this year, should have a better idea in the next few weeks as they have some matchups with teams MAML has played recently and then a matchup with MAML 2/2. CL did get rocked by Buffalo and STMA it's last 2 games.
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Re: Luverne at Redwood Falls
Is this the 5A thread now?GoldyGopher wrote:If Luverne can score early they may score often. I anticipate Redwood has a much better offensive showing against Luverne then they did in the first meeting.elliott70 wrote:Who wins?
My prediction-
Luverne: 7
Redwood Valley: 5
What happened to your Redwood prediction?
Re: Luverne at Redwood Falls
Morphed into 5A, but set up a new thread for that...MrBoDangles wrote:Is this the 5A thread now?GoldyGopher wrote:If Luverne can score early they may score often. I anticipate Redwood has a much better offensive showing against Luverne then they did in the first meeting.elliott70 wrote:Who wins?
My prediction-
Luverne: 7
Redwood Valley: 5
What happened to your Redwood prediction?
my prediction was Luverne.
I think Goldy answered ...
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am
- Location: Not Luverne
Re: Luverne at Redwood Falls
My prediction of Luverne scoring 7 goals and winning was spot on. Just got the Redwood scoring goals portion wrong. I'll move over to 5A.MrBoDangles wrote:Is this the 5A thread now?GoldyGopher wrote:If Luverne can score early they may score often. I anticipate Redwood has a much better offensive showing against Luverne then they did in the first meeting.elliott70 wrote:Who wins?
My prediction-
Luverne: 7
Redwood Valley: 5
What happened to your Redwood prediction?
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration