Should the girls play high school hockey at all? It sounds like they're better off playing 19U.let them get more games and shifts with the youth program
Girls Hockey is Growing!
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm
U15 quality is (can be) better than JV, more games, etc. Obviously, varsity is very good hockey. The quality of practices is probably even more important. Some JV programs may be varsity like in practices and others maybe not.InigoMontoya wrote:Should the girls play high school hockey at all? It sounds like they're better off playing 19U.let them get more games and shifts with the youth program
The top players likely play a lot of spring/fall games so lack of games really isn't a problem in the grand scheme. That said, 45 U15 games might be better than 20 JV games but each situation is different so its hard to make broad generalizations.
The argument is all chicken or the egg, isn't it? Many associations take the best 8th and 9th graders for JV / Varsity to fill spots. If you want your daughter, like I do, to play U15, well, her team will be all U13s because the high schools takes all high schoolers. But then who is your daughter left playing with and against? Who knows how good the quality is? Is it better than the JV? If the good 8th and 9th graders my daughter's played and against are gone (A level players in Association), what to do? So in my instance I'm left to wonder which option is better as an 8th grader.Mavs wrote:U15 quality is (can be) better than JV, more games, etc. Obviously, varsity is very good hockey. The quality of practices is probably even more important. Some JV programs may be varsity like in practices and others maybe not.InigoMontoya wrote:Should the girls play high school hockey at all? It sounds like they're better off playing 19U.let them get more games and shifts with the youth program
The top players likely play a lot of spring/fall games so lack of games really isn't a problem in the grand scheme. That said, 45 U15 games might be better than 20 JV games but each situation is different so its hard to make broad generalizations.
That's when cost does become an issue. Reducing the ice bill by 80% is a massive factor. Consistent ice times is a factor. Getting to eat dinner as a family is a factor. Getting enough sleep during adolescence, because there's no more 8pm practices before the 6am wake-up call, is a factor. And those are all reasons, if competition is moderately equal, that lead kids to playing HS hockey, rather than U15, as 8th graders.
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:20 am
-
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:59 pm
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:20 am
-
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm
So in sum....Mavs wrote:Is that what it is? Wow.InigoMontoya wrote:Is 60 hours of practice and 50 games better than 120 hours of practice and 25 games?
Practice is the most important...other then developing confidence with moves, etc in games. Thanks for pointing that out if its true.
-120 hours of practice (combinations of ice time / off-ice training)
-25 games
-1/4 to 1/5 of the cost of association hockey
-Ice time is right after school, so the kids will be home for dinner
-Competition will be either very good (varsity) or comparable to U15 (most JV teams).
If that's the "pro" list, I think my daughter should try out for the high school in 8th grade. Never mind whether she makes it. It seems like it is worth a shot.
-
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:59 pm
Of course the right "answer" is unique to each player, but addjg2112 wrote:So in sum....Mavs wrote:Is that what it is? Wow.InigoMontoya wrote:Is 60 hours of practice and 50 games better than 120 hours of practice and 25 games?
Practice is the most important...other then developing confidence with moves, etc in games. Thanks for pointing that out if its true.
-120 hours of practice (combinations of ice time / off-ice training)
-25 games
-1/4 to 1/5 of the cost of association hockey
-Ice time is right after school, so the kids will be home for dinner
-Competition will be either very good (varsity) or comparable to U15 (most JV teams).
If that's the "pro" list, I think my daughter should try out for the high school in 8th grade. Never mind whether she makes it. It seems like it is worth a shot.
*transportation is provided and if I can't get to a game there is no scramble to find my daughter a ride, and that if I am or plan to go I don't have to get there an hour or hours before the game
to the "pro" list, I concur with jg
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:39 pm
Some communities, which have only one rink, have to get creative as to when their practices are scheduled. They're not always after school. I know the majority are after school though.jg2112 wrote:So in sum....Mavs wrote:Is that what it is? Wow.InigoMontoya wrote:Is 60 hours of practice and 50 games better than 120 hours of practice and 25 games?
Practice is the most important...other then developing confidence with moves, etc in games. Thanks for pointing that out if its true.
-120 hours of practice (combinations of ice time / off-ice training)
-25 games
-1/4 to 1/5 of the cost of association hockey
-Ice time is right after school, so the kids will be home for dinner
-Competition will be either very good (varsity) or comparable to U15 (most JV teams).
If that's the "pro" list, I think my daughter should try out for the high school in 8th grade. Never mind whether she makes it. It seems like it is worth a shot.