best JGB players
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:30 pm
best JGB players
who are the guys to look out for this year?
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:44 pm
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:34 pm
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:38 pm
whats up boys!!! i would agree 14 and 12 were both good on burnsville there whole team is pretty solid cheap and mouthy but they know how to play some puck....5 hole sniper wrote:ill back you up on that one D-ROCkdh8 wrote:He was really good and number 12 I think it was on bville is small but has really nice handsCake eater wrote:i caught a bit of a bville game and number 14 is outstanding.
i heard he scored 11 goals in the rochester tournament?
is that true?
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:44 pm
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:44 pm
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:34 pm
We will see how many goals he gets agains wayzata gold's amazing defense and goalies. They are up to their old tricks again giving up only 3 goals in their first five games. If 14 can score a hat-trick against that i will be impressed.Cake eater wrote:dude he will destroy you. he had 11 goals in three games.B Dubs wrote:number 14 from burnsville isnt even that good
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:23 pm
I'd be surprised if he gets a goal in the game facing one of the best goalies in the state for JGB.Mermaid Man wrote:We will see how many goals he gets agains wayzata gold's amazing defense and goalies. They are up to their old tricks again giving up only 3 goals in their first five games. If 14 can score a hat-trick against that i will be impressed.Cake eater wrote:dude he will destroy you. he had 11 goals in three games.B Dubs wrote:number 14 from burnsville isnt even that good
number twelve is one of their biggest guys and has horrible hands you prob got the wrong guy. its prob 20 8 4 or 5 your thinking of[/quote]Cake eater wrote:He was really good and number 12 I think it was on bville is small but has really nice hands
Yeah sorry I must have the wrong guy I thought it was him, probably 20 I was thinking of
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:44 pm
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:30 pm
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:34 pm
but you didn't beat wayzata goldburnsvillesbeast v2 wrote:we beat edina green twice and we were missing alot of guys?studmuffin88 wrote:those burnsville kids were ok. they had a few little guys with good hands but their D were slow. they are overrated though. not worth a number five rank in state right now
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:44 pm
he was just saying we beat the number 2 team twice chillMermaid Man wrote:but you didn't beat wayzata goldburnsvillesbeast v2 wrote:we beat edina green twice and we were missing alot of guys?studmuffin88 wrote:those burnsville kids were ok. they had a few little guys with good hands but their D were slow. they are overrated though. not worth a number five rank in state right now
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:44 pm
[quote="studmuffin88"]no offense to edina but it doesn't really make sense when we beat them and we are still ranked behind them. and the same for woodbury. cause they beat us. so should the rankings go more in the order of Woodbury, STA, Edina? does anyone else think these rankings are kinda messed up?[/quote
One win does not make a Ranking. How about a teams record over the course of the season thus far. Strength of schedule etcetera. Also a 1-1 tie to Rosemount does not help your ranking #38.
One win does not make a Ranking. How about a teams record over the course of the season thus far. Strength of schedule etcetera. Also a 1-1 tie to Rosemount does not help your ranking #38.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:44 pm
davinci wrote:yes you are right. more than just one win does contribute to a ranking. but for one the rosmemount game was after the ranking. two, if you are ahead of someone in the rankings that means that at that point in the season you are better than them. so therefore the order should be as listed above. okay so edina may have a harder schedule, i'll give them that, but when you look at the straight up facts of the STA vs. Edina game, Edina lost. not saying they are a bad team. just saying that right now edina isn't better than STA.studmuffin88 wrote:no offense to edina but it doesn't really make sense when we beat them and we are still ranked behind them. and the same for woodbury. cause they beat us. so should the rankings go more in the order of Woodbury, STA, Edina? does anyone else think these rankings are kinda messed up?[/quote
One win does not make a Ranking. How about a teams record over the course of the season thus far. Strength of schedule etcetera. Also a 1-1 tie to Rosemount does not help your ranking #38.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:44 pm
1) wayzeta gold 2)woodbury 3)white bear orange 4)roseville 5/6/7)St. Thomas,edina white,burnsville
i haven't seen white bear or roseville this year but they play in a tough league with alot of competition so i'm estimating they should be pretty well rounded. i think the five six and seven could prolly go 5=burnsville 6=st.thomas 7=edina. the burnsville team will have alot of difficulties with a fast team if they play one. they can play reall well when they play slow teams but their defensmen are not quick enough to keep up with speedsters. the edina team is better than alot of teams and should be prolly three or four but the only reason i would put them lower is simply because of the schwanns cup. if they beat a couple more respectable teams then they should easily be able to crawl back up into the three or four spot. wayzeta/woodbury are the top two teams right now. this list can easily change dramatically after the high quality and high powered tournament this coming up weekend in edina.
i haven't seen white bear or roseville this year but they play in a tough league with alot of competition so i'm estimating they should be pretty well rounded. i think the five six and seven could prolly go 5=burnsville 6=st.thomas 7=edina. the burnsville team will have alot of difficulties with a fast team if they play one. they can play reall well when they play slow teams but their defensmen are not quick enough to keep up with speedsters. the edina team is better than alot of teams and should be prolly three or four but the only reason i would put them lower is simply because of the schwanns cup. if they beat a couple more respectable teams then they should easily be able to crawl back up into the three or four spot. wayzeta/woodbury are the top two teams right now. this list can easily change dramatically after the high quality and high powered tournament this coming up weekend in edina.
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:34 pm