2008-09 Connecticut High School Hockey Rankings

Mismatch games (between teams rated more than 4 goals apart) are not used in ratings calculations. 

RANK  TEAM                               W  L  T   >4   GmPerf Sched  Total  Last 5    
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1,Fairfield Prep,CT,__________________ 13  6  1,  0   1.6,   9.0,  10.67,  9.03 
  2,Trinity Catholic,CT,________________ 19  3  0,  4   2.5,   7.7,  10.25,  8.95 
  3,Hamden,CT,__________________________ 15  4  1,  0   1.1,   8.7,   9.72,  9.06 
  4,Notre Dame-Fairfield,CT,____________ 16  4  1,  0   1.3,   8.2,   9.50,  9.28 
  5,Simsbury,CT,________________________ 14  6  1,  2   1.3,   7.9,   9.15,  8.68 
  6,Xavier,CT,__________________________ 12  7  1,  1   1.0,   8.1,   9.13,  9.48 
  7,Fermi,CT,___________________________ 16  5  1,  2   1.1,   7.9,   8.92,  9.67 
  8,West Haven,CT,______________________ 10 10  0,  1   0.3,   8.5,   8.80,  9.26 
  9,Glastonbury,CT,_____________________ 14  6  2,  0   1.3,   7.5,   8.78,  8.26 
 10,Greenwich,CT,_______________________ 15  5  3,  1   1.3,   7.4,   8.72,  9.28 
 11,Enfield,CT,_________________________ 17  5  0,  2   1.6,   7.0,   8.64,  8.58 
 12,Notre Dame-West Haven,CT,___________  9 10  1,  0  -0.3,   8.8,   8.54,  9.85 
 13,New Canaan,CT,______________________ 10  8  3,  1   0.4,   8.0,   8.39,  8.67 
 14,East Haven,CT,______________________ 12  6  2,  1   0.8,   7.5,   8.25,  9.88 
 15,Cheshire,CT,________________________ 17  3  2,  1   1.6,   6.6,   8.14,  8.35 
 16,Darien,CT,__________________________ 13  7  3,  1   0.1,   8.0,   8.13,  8.87 
 17,Tri-Town,CT,________________________ 13  7  1,  1   0.9,   7.2,   8.12,  6.13 
 18,North Haven,CT,_____________________ 10  8  2,  0   0.0,   8.1,   8.11,  7.53 
 19,Branford,CT,________________________ 15  6  1,  1   1.2,   6.9,   8.11,  8.16 
 20,Ridgefield,CT,______________________  9 12  1,  1  -0.0,   7.9,   7.83,  8.09 
 21,Staples-Weston,CT,__________________ 12  9  0,  2   1.1,   6.7,   7.82,  8.49 
 22,Conard,CT,__________________________ 11  9  1,  0  -0.1,   7.9,   7.80,  8.62 
 23,Amity,CT,___________________________ 12  8  1,  0   0.6,   7.0,   7.56,  7.07 
 24,South Windsor,CT,___________________  8 13  1,  0  -0.5,   8.0,   7.51,  8.48 
 25,Avon,CT,____________________________ 12  9  1,  0   0.1,   7.3,   7.45,  8.57 
 26,Hall-Southington,CT,________________ 17  3  2,  4   1.8,   5.4,   7.20,  7.05 
 27,Lyman Hall,CT,______________________ 15  6  0,  2   0.8,   6.3,   7.07,  7.03 
 28,St Joseph,CT,_______________________ 12  8  1,  1   0.1,   7.0,   7.06,  5.35 
 29,Daniel Hand,CT,_____________________  5 13  1,  0  -1.1,   8.1,   6.97,  7.64 
 30,Suffield-Granby-Windsor Locks,CT,___ 13  8  0,  1   0.6,   6.4,   6.93,  5.79 
 31,St Bernard-Bacon,CT,________________ 13  9  0,  1   1.0,   5.9,   6.83,  8.35 
 32,Stamford,CT,________________________ 11  9  1,  0   0.2,   6.6,   6.78,  6.20 
 33,Fairfield Warde/Ludlowe,CT,_________  7 11  2,  0  -0.4,   7.0,   6.62,  7.48 
 34,East Catholic,CT,___________________  9 10  1,  0  -0.3,   6.9,   6.61,  6.30 
 35,Guilford,CT,________________________ 14  6  0,  4   1.0,   5.6,   6.58,  6.68 
 36,Immaculate,CT,______________________  5 16  0,  0  -1.8,   8.3,   6.51,  7.37 
 37,Farmington,CT,______________________  6 13  1,  0  -0.8,   7.3,   6.45,  5.14 
 38,Bethel-Brookfield-Danbury,CT,_______ 16  5  0,  0   1.2,   5.0,   6.23,  6.66 
 39,North Branford,CT,__________________  4 14  2,  0  -1.5,   7.5,   6.04,  5.68 
 40,New Milford,CT,_____________________  8 13  0,  0  -0.2,   6.1,   5.83,  5.34 
 41,Joel Barlow,CT,_____________________ 14  8  0,  1   0.6,   5.2,   5.82,  6.17 
 42,Housatonic-Northwestern,CT,_________ 11 10  0,  0  -0.2,   6.0,   5.82,  5.96 
 43,Rocky Hill-RHAM,CT,_________________ 10  9  2,  0   0.5,   5.2,   5.71,  5.75 
 44,Northwest Catholic,CT,______________ 14  6  2,  2   0.3,   5.4,   5.69,  4.95 
 45,Trumbull,CT,________________________  6 13  1,  1  -1.0,   6.6,   5.62,  5.25 
 46,Westhill,CT,________________________  4 15  1,  1  -1.4,   7.0,   5.59,  4.41 
 47,Wilton,CT,__________________________  7 12  0,  1  -0.9,   6.3,   5.40,  4.59 
 48,Rockville-Manchester,CT,____________  9 12  0,  2  -0.7,   5.9,   5.19,  5.74 
 49,Masuk,CT,___________________________ 11  9  0,  0  -0.1,   5.1,   5.05,  5.12 
 50,Newington-Berlin,CT,________________ 10 11  1,  0  -0.1,   5.1,   5.01,  5.64 
 51,Watertown-Pomperaug,CT,_____________  6 14  1,  0  -1.1,   5.9,   4.80,  3.61 
 52,Wethersfield,CT,____________________  3 16  1,  3  -2.1,   6.9,   4.79,  4.59 
 53,EO Smith-Tolland-Windham,CT,________  7 12  2,  1  -0.3,   4.9,   4.60,  5.47 
 54,Milford Coop,CT,____________________  3 17  0,  2  -2.1,   6.3,   4.22,  4.86 
 55,Sheehan,CT,_________________________  2 18  0,  0  -1.9,   6.2,   4.21,  3.12 
 56,Bolton-Coventry-Lyman Memorial,CT,__  7 13  0,  0  -0.9,   5.1,   4.17,  4.99 
 57,Newtown,CT,_________________________  6 14  0,  2  -0.7,   4.7,   3.99,  4.72 
 58,Shelton,CT,_________________________  4 16  0,  2  -1.3,   4.7,   3.35,  3.31 
 59,Shepaug-Litchfield-Wamogo,CT,_______  5 14  1,  0  -1.5,   4.5,   3.03,  1.26 
 60,Norwalk-McMahon,CT,_________________  0 19  1,  8  -3.2,   5.2,   2.05,  1.80 
 61,Fitch-East Lyme-Ledyard,CT,_________  2 17  0,  7  -2.8,   4.0,   1.13,  1.73 
 62,Windsor-East Granby,CT,_____________  1 19  0,  9  -3.0,   3.1,   0.06,  0.34 

Since some "mismatch" games are not used in determining the rankings, the Sched column can be 
somewhat misleading as it reflects the average opponent strength of only the opponents ranked 
within 4 goals of each team.